Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'You have to be kidding': MAGA melts down as Spelling Bee accepts new word: womyn
https://www.rawstory.com/maga-2670451159/The Scripps National Spelling Bees annual list of study words for third graders drew the ire of conservatives fuming over its embrace of the feminist variation for women.
The 2024-25 study list posted on school district websites includes the term womyn as an approved option for spelling women that third graders who want to compete in the national spelling competition can use, Fox News Digital reported.
While the spelling list noted that women is the preferred spelling, allowing the option for third-grade students to spell womyn in the competition lit up MAGA world.
--------
Question for the National Spelling Bee: What is a womyn? Kristen Waggoner, the president of the Alliance Defending Freedom, asked her X followers.
X user Dean Cramer opined that the change comes because womyn doesnt have men in the word.
Changing the spelling of women to womyn in a spelling bee? This isnt progress, its ideological nonsense, The Calvin Report wrote. Leave language and kids out of this agenda.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'You have to be kidding': MAGA melts down as Spelling Bee accepts new word: womyn (Original Post)
Demovictory9
Dec 13
OP
No problem, dopo. They're going to make MAGAt a word too. But you'll have a cow
Wonder Why
Dec 13
#6
SheltieLover
(60,247 posts)1. I like it!
Let's face it folks, between the two sexes, who was most likely to birth the other, men or womyn?
SharonClark
(10,351 posts)2. MAGATS our outraged about almost everything.
Theyre racist and sexist little snowflakes.
CurtEastPoint
(19,226 posts)3. Where have these cretins been? "Womyn" has been around for years!
Dave Bowman
(3,856 posts)4. They only get outraged on cue.
Emrys
(8,053 posts)5. At least since the 1980s, to my recollection
It's a brave or stupid soul who tries to inject etymology into this sort of debate, but ...
The word woman is derived from the Old English word wīfmann ('woman-person'), which is formed from wīf (the source of wife), then meaning 'woman', and mann (the source of man), then meaning 'person, human', originally without connotations of gender. Man took on its additional masculine meaning in the Late Middle English period, replacing the now-obsolete word wer. This has created the present situation with man bearing a dual meaningeither masculine or nonspecific.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_spellings_of_woman
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_spellings_of_woman
As a hangover from this, I've worked on books where the author and/or publisher wanted us to avoid using "man" in the sense of "mankind". "Humanity" might have been an alternative, but would have fallen foul of the same sensitivities.
It reminds me of a good-natured dispute I had with a young feminist in the 1980s, when she insisted the word "boisterous" was sexist because it was derived from the word "boy" and implied that females couldn't be rowdy and spirited and rough. Etymology didn't help me in that one either.
The same Wikipedia article quoted above goes on to observe, "The word womyn appeared as an Older Scots spelling of woman in the Scots poetry of James Hogg," so anyone unwise or unlucky enough to get into an argument with a MAGA type could point out that it dates back to the turn of the eighteenth/nineteenth centuries.
Wonder Why
(4,718 posts)6. No problem, dopo. They're going to make MAGAt a word too. But you'll have a cow
when you hear the definition!